I bought a new yo-yo last week. Back in my youth I used to love entering yo-yo competitions demonstrating my prowess. I have bought many a yo-yo in my life but never before had I seen one with a disclaimer that told me that by removing the attached tag, I was solely responsible for any damage caused by the yo-yo. It was a stark reminder that almost everything now comes with some warning or disclaimer and we blindly agree to the legal conditions because we want to use the item.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Playing with a yo-yo in one thing but driving a car is an entirely different matter. When we purchase a new vehicle, amid the excitement and myriad of features to explore, we often encounter screens asking for our consent for various services and data sharing agreements. Eager to hit the road, we often click 'Yes' or 'OK' not reading all the conditions or fully understanding the implications.
A recent specific case brought to light this exact issue. A US driver of a Chevrolet (made by General Motors) was bewildered to find his car insurance premium jumped by over 21 per cent without any clear justification. Upon digging deeper, he found his insurance company had a 258-page report detailing each time the car had been driven over the previous six months. It included 640 trips, start and end times, distance driven and any accounts of speeding, hard braking or hard acceleration. Based on this report, the insurance company rated the driver as a higher risk and subsequently increased his premium.
Data collection and sharing isn't limited to those who explicitly sign up for usage-based insurance programs. Modern vehicles, being internet-enabled, offer a plethora of connected services, from navigation aids to remote control features via smartphone apps. Unbeknown to many, opting into seemingly benign features can lead to your driving data being shared with data brokers and, subsequently, insurance companies.
This practice raises profound privacy concerns. The partnerships between automakers and data brokers are often shrouded in opacity, with the real extent of data sharing buried deep within complex privacy policies and user agreements that few take the time to read thoroughly.
Moreover, some drivers have reported that their data was shared and their insurance rates affected even without their explicit consent to these monitoring programs.
The situation becomes even more problematic when you consider that this isn't an isolated incident; other major automakers are engaging in similar practices. They argue that these programs are designed to encourage safer driving habits.
However, the clandestine nature of the data collection and the potential for it to impact insurance premiums without clear consent is troubling.
Today it is insurance premiums but before we know it, we will be receiving fines in the mail for erratic driving behaviour. Drivers could find themselves in court telling a magistrate that the swerving and irregular movements were to avoid a dog that ran out on to the road. The data doesn't lie but the circumstances may give context.
As consumers, it's vital to be more vigilant and informed about the technologies we adopt, especially those embedded in everyday items like our cars.
Just as we might laugh off a warning tag on a yo-yo, the real consequences of clicking 'agree' on our car's touchscreen can be far-reaching and not quite as amusing.
With increased awareness, stringent regulations, and more transparent practices we may hope to navigate this complex landscape without inadvertently compromising our privacy and financial well-being.
Oh, and read the information before you click 'OK'.
