Abortion bill: Member for Murray Helen Dalton shares personal story

She shared the story of the "backyard procedure" when she spoke to the bill before NSW Parliament on Wednesday.

And while she said the "bill is not perfect", she believes the time is right for change.

"I believe that something like this (a backyard procedure) should never happen again and that it is vitally important for women to have access to safe and lawful health services," Ms Dalton said.

"I always try to ensure my vote in parliament is consistent with the majority view in my electorate and I have concerns with the bill.

"I feel the provision allowing a pregnancy to be terminated at 22 weeks may be too late. I believe that Tasmanian law allowing unrestricted abortion until 16 weeks, and requiring the consent of two doctors after this time, is a better option.

"But doctors tell me it is rare for pregnancies to be terminated beyond 16 weeks in other states, even if the law permits it to happen.

"A decision to end a pregnancy is not something a woman ever takes lightly.

RELATED

"NSW is the only state yet to decriminalise abortion.

"Our existing laws date back to 1900 and while this bill is not perfect, I believe the time is right for change."

Wagga's independent Joe McGirr said he will vote against a bill to decriminalise abortion and has called for amendments to its terms.

Dr McGirr told Parliament on Wednesday afternoon that he would oppose the bill because it did not have provisions for "counselling" of women seeking an abortion and did not consider the "rights" of an unborn baby past 22 weeks gestation.

"I will not be supporting the bill and I will be seeking to introduce amendments," Dr McGirr said.

The Member for Wagga also criticised Parliament for moving forward too quickly and he felt a "great disappointment regarding the lack of community consultation and opportunity for public comment in the debate".

The independent MP said he had been "inundated" with phone calls and emails, which started as soon as media reports emerged last weekend about the pending legislation.

Dr McGirr said he had taken on board the messages from individual constituents and groups, along with his own experience in the medical field.

"These concerns have convinced me to oppose the bill. I do not do so lightly, but it is the decision I have made," he said.

"I do not accept that the legislation will improve access to termination services. I do not accept that it will make things safer for women.

"I am concerned that the bill undermines the rights of potential humans and impacts on religious freedom."

Meanwhile, Member for Albury Justin Clancy also spoke to the bill on Wednesday, asking the chamber to help build the legislation to "address some of the concerns raised".

Mr Clancy said he could not hide the fact his "faith is important too".

"It calls me to know that life is precious. It also calls me to not judge, to be compassionate, to listen," he said.

"The criminalisation of the woman through law is a blunt way to promote human dignity."

Mr Clancy acknowledged that the bill may pass in its current form but called on the chamber to work amendments into the bill.

"I would like to see amendments that help address concerns held by members of our community before I can give my support to the bill," Mr Clancy said.

"Irrespective of the outcome of this debate, for the individual the decision is and will always be profound - a decision that balances the preciousness of life with the complexity of human experience."

The bill is expected to come to a vote later this week.

***

While you're with us, did you know that you can now receive updates straight to your inbox every Monday at 6am from The Area News? To make sure you're up to date with all the Griffith and MIA news you can sign up here.