News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Drivers upset over mobile phone blitz 

Drivers upset over mobile phone blitz

05 Mar, 2010 10:41 AM
RESIDENTS have accused local police of being overzealous in their blitz on drivers using mobile phones.

Two women in as many days contacted The Area News last week claiming they had been wrongly accused of talking on their mobiles while driving.

One of the women, who did not wish to be named, was issued with an infringement notice despite maintaining her phone was not even in the car at the time.

The woman has since reported the matter to the Police Integrity Commission and said the experience left her feeling humiliated and angry.

"I was driving along Banna Avenue and I noticed blue and red flashing lights in my rear vision mirror," she said.

"I moved over to the left and parked my car so they could get around and go ahead but they drove in behind me.

"The constable came to my window and asked me if I knew it was an offence to be talking on the mobile phone while you're driving.

"I said that I didn't even have my mobile phone on me and that if he wanted to search my car to go ahead.

"But he said that if I wanted to dispute it I'd have to do it in court."

Another woman who claims she was wrongly accused said she was upset when an officer seized her phone to check if any calls were in progress when she was stopped.

However, Griffith Police commander Michael Rowan defended his officers, saying they would not pull over somebody "unless they were sure an offence had been committed".

He said police were permitted to examine the phones of people they suspected of using them while driving in order to prove or disprove an offence.

"If police believe an offence has been committed they're quite within their powers to stop the relevant person and investigate that offence and the same principal applies for any person for any offence," Commander Rowan said.

"The avenue for somebody who has been issued with an infringement notice and they believe it has been error or otherwise can elect to have the matter dealt with before a court."

The woman pulled over in Banna Avenue said she still did not know whether the officer went through with the infringement notice or not.

"So far it looks as though I'm not getting a fine, but I would have liked an apology," she said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Good on the police for taking such a stance. As a cyclist I have had too many near misses with people talking on their phones. On my regular commute I see at least one person every day on their phone, often up to 6. The woman who "didn't want to be named" should have thanked the officer for cracking down on mobile usage instead of whining about her innocence. She didn't even get a fine!! Now she wants an apology! Wake up to yourself. Go for it coppers, it's time this scourge was checked.
Posted by Bilby, 5/03/2010 12:37:09 PM, on The Area News
I thought it was illegal to use mobile phone while driving, next people will winge about being booked for travelling at 130 km/hr. get real
Posted by HOMER, 6/03/2010 8:12:41 AM, on The Area News
Regarding the criticism by some of the Police efforts to quell the epidemic use of mobile phones by motorists, there is not a single day goes by that I don't see any number of selfish, dangerous and inconsiderate motorists on the phone whilst driving. For those people who consider it OK, how will you feel if your son / daughter / mum / dad is seriously injured (or killed) by this type of blatant law breaker? Is the potential outcome any different to being the victim to an unprovoked assault by a selfish, dangererous and inconsiderate person? The answer is NO. I support the Police for their often unappreciated efforts to make our roads and community a safer place. Keep up the good work.
Posted by Michael Toohey, 6/03/2010 4:34:22 PM, on The Area News
Four days ago, I found myself being persued (lights and siren) and pulled over by the police. I was told the officer had observed me holding my mobile phone to my ear as he drove past in the opposite direction. This was despite my mobile being zipped up in my handbag on a seat that I physically could not reach unless I stopped the car and took my seat belt off and moved over. The officer told me that he did not care what I said, he knew what he saw! Finally, I begged him to look at my phone. After showing him all ingoing, outgoing, calls/messages he agreed that there were no indications the phone had been used, but he still did not believe me as he "knew" he saw me. After a long discussion he agreed not to book me, but told me that both he and I knew I was using my phone! Thus calling me a liar. I suffer from an anxiety based disorder/severe post traumatic stress disorder & this has now left me feeling unsafe to drive in case I am falsely accussed in future of something more serious. I completely understand police can make mistakes & acknowledge they do an amazing job, but I would appreciate that when a mistake is made, they have the courage and self-respect to apologise.
Posted by Hamishisacat, 27/04/2010 1:50:00 PM, on The Area News
I have just read a report about a guy being booked for using his phone while stopped at the side of the road as he was considered to be in control of the vehicle as the motor was still running. Surely this is taking things too far!
Posted by tonyo, 20/06/2010 8:17:47 AM, on The Area News

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Area News







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...