News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Council shake-up 

Council shake-up

22 Feb, 2012 05:00 AM
JOB cuts at Griffith City Council have not been ruled out as the general manager looks to slash up to $900,000 from operational costs.

Council staff will find out whether they still have jobs after councillors decide their fate next Tuesday night.

General manager Brett Stonestreet has been tasked with cutting operational costs at council after staff numbers ballooned to more than 370, including casuals, under his predecessor Peter Brooks.

He will propose several recommendations for an organisational restructure at next week’s council meeting.

Councillors will consider the options behind closed doors.

Staff will then be advised of the results in writing and will have a chance to discuss the changes one-on-one with Mr Stonestreet.

Mr Stonestreet would not confirm the extent of the cuts he would recommend but confirmed he was looking to slash between $800,000 and $900,000 from operational costs, which could include staff wages as well as other resources and services.

“Council is in the advanced stages of a 10-year financial plan, which has highlighted the need to refocus and reshape our services,” Mr Stonestreet said. “That means there will be a redirection of resources.

“I’m not going to start saying there will be ‘x’ staff here, or ‘x’ staff there, it is simply a process of resource reallocation.”

The need to cut back on spending has been no secret between council and the public, with Mr Stonestreet announcing within weeks of taking the general manager position he would initiate a comprehensive review of services.

All departments participated in the review which confirmed cutbacks were needed to ensure council could continue to deliver essential services.

A review of the organisational structure had ensued.

Former mayor John Dal Broi said council had come a long way from having between 160 and 180 staff in the early days of his tenure.

“I was quite concerned when I heard a few months ago that there were more than 400 people on staff –at that rate, in three or four years, council’s income would not be able to cover the extra expenditure,” Mr Dal Broi said.

“I suspect crunch day has turned up for the new general manager and it’s time to seriously look at council’s financial position.

“They’ve grown too much, too quickly – they were always going to have to pull the plug sometime.

“Unfortunately, that means people will lose their positions and council will cop a lot of flak about the services that will be withdrawn.”

Mr Dal Broi felt the city’s roads were suffering as a result of council’s stretched resources.

Mr Stonestreet has confirmed the 10-year financial plan will have a focus on infrastructure.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Perhaps they should do an audit - who actually made what happen over the past five years. And not airy fairy stuff, but who is building the roads, who is taking the rubbish, who has built the new parks, who is getting our drinking water to us. We dont mind seeing spending on things that benefit us, but things like the dead weight in the council admin/HR should be cut.

Add that to personal coaching for staff, costing a few hundred thousand... If they could not do the job, or cant work as a team, they should be sacked.

Posted by Mmm, 22/02/2012 7:38:25 AM, on The Area News
Feel sorry for Brett Stonestreet who had to come in and clean up the dreadful mess Peter Brooks left.
Posted by John, 22/02/2012 11:22:16 AM, on The Area News
Too many red tapes!!!

Only means the current system is not efficient to its optimum. Most of Government, especially in the country, have to go somewhere else first then back and forth and sideways before actions are taken. All too clear so as to say, the powers-that-be doesn't trust regional powers. And we seem to be in agreement with the status quo. Bless

Posted by i_complain.com, 22/02/2012 9:10:13 PM, on The Area News
Noticed today while walking down Banna Avenue that the gardening is not up to date; e.g. no sign of gardeners blowing the leaves away near Library which they normally do; cut backs???


Posted by Serendipity, 22/02/2012 11:54:56 PM, on The Area News

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Area News







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...