News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Clubs slam pokie plans 

Clubs slam pokie plans

06 Sep, 2010 01:00 AM
LOCAL club managers have hit out at planned hardline new restrictions on pokies aimed at saving chronic gamblers from themselves.

Tasmanian independent Andrew Wilkie has struck a deal with Labor to introduce a raft of tough new measures if the party forms government - including limiting withdrawals from club ATMs to $250 a day and new "smart card" technology that restricts the amount punters can gamble.

Griffith Ex-Servicemen's CEO Gus Lico, who oversees more than 180 pokies at the two Exies clubs, said the new approach was an "attack on personal freedoms" and could seriously hurt the not-for-profit clubs.

"People should be able to control their own destiny ... there's no difference between someone problem gambling then there is someone problem shopping," Mr Lico said.

"Where do you stop putting restrictions on people? In the end, it comes down to personal responsibility.

"We (clubs) don't go out to get individuals to spend money on pokies. They're there for everyone and it's a form of entertainment and it's up to gamblers to control what they do."

Mr Lico said there were already strict measures in place to monitor and control problem gamblers in local clubs.

Clubs Australia has also slammed the move, saying Prime Minister Julia Gillard had broken a written promise to 4000 clubs that she would consult them before making any changes to poker machine laws.

However, local counsellor Larissa Pfitzner said the new laws, if enacted, would be a "step in the right direction".

"Anything that helps curb problem gambling is a good thing but while these measures might reduce gambling, I'm not sure they would have a huge impact on problem gambling," Mrs Pfitzner said.

"You could ban pokies completely and the people who are addicted to them would just find something else to be addicted to.

"We've really got to address the cause of why people gamble - the personal, emotional and lifestyle issues.

"Unless you unlock each person's emotional driver, you're not going to solve the problem."

Long-time anti-pokie campaigner Senator Nick Xenophon said the announcement of the agreement was a ''historic day''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As a former hospitality worker, I have always felt uncomfortable with the predatory nature of poker machines and in-club advertising. Gambling addiction is a compulsion and something which goes beyond "it's their choice what to do with their money" - and poker machines are designed specifically to prey upon those compulsions for profit. Despite this, I'm pretty uncomfortable with Wilkie's demands - perhaps because I know firsthand how hard this will hit clubs, or perhaps because I am ideologically opposed to nanny-state-style legislations. Clubs have self-exclusion policies to help problem gamblers to stop if it is their wish to do so, and with no corresponding hit to recreational gamblers. In any case, isn't it a state, rather than federal, government issue?
Posted by Mr. Swing, 6/09/2010 2:35:00 PM, on The Area News

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Area News







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...